The Best Resource For Mixed Martial Arts MMA

UFC 212: Aldo vs. Holloway live judging and scoring

37 0

Article Source – bloodyelbow.com

Certified judge Paul Gift scores UFC 212’s rounds in real time with explanations

UFC 212 goes down in Rio tonight and the odds of the main event of Jose Aldo vs. Max Holloway going to a decision currently sit around 60%. It’s the perfect time to test a new idea here at Bloody Elbow, having a certified and licensed judge talk through his scoring of each round in real time.

I got certified in August of last year and have since worked local shows in Los Angeles for the California Amateur Mixed Martial Arts Organization (CAMO). I’m still learning and growing from every event and will surely make mistakes here, but I understand how MMA rounds are supposed to be scored and will try to share my thoughts on those elements during the breaks between each round.

I’ll be watching UFC 212 with the volume on mute so, with apologies to Jon Anik, Brian Stann, and Dominick Cruz, I won’t hear when “that hurt him,” there’s a “nice knee,” or when someone is “off to a good start here.” The “oooohs” and “aaaahs” from the crowd will be total silence. I’ll have to make all determinations myself like a regular judge.

Rounds are scored in MMA based on damage. If control enters your mind, get it out immediately. And a takedown just changes the position of the fight unless it causes or leads to damage.

Readers should consider a single criteria for scoring: Effective Striking/Grappling. While effective aggressiveness and fighting area control can possibly be scoring criteria as well, their use is so rare that forgetting about them will instantaneously improve readers’ judging games by leaps and bounds.

Effective Striking/Grappling:

Legal blows that have immediate or cumulative damage with the potential to contribute towards the end of the match with the IMMEDIATE weighing more heavily than the cumulative damage.

Successful execution of takedowns, submission attempts, reversals and the achievement of advantageous positions that produce immediate or cumulative damage with the potential to contribute to the end of the match, with the IMMEDIATE weighing more heavily than the cumulative damage.

It shall be noted that a successful takedown is not merely a changing of position, but the establishment of an attack from the use of the takedown.

Top and bottom position fighters are assessed more on the impactful/damaging result of their actions, more so than their position.

Since I’m not a regulator worried about getting sued in the future, the politically correct word “impact” in the definition above has been replaced with “damage” – the word originally intended by the authors of the new scoring criteria.

The 2017 judging criteria will be used for 10-8 scores. The 3 D’s of Dominance, Damage, and Duration only apply to 10-8 considerations and the scoring of 10-9s, 10-10s, and 10-7s didn’t change. For all scores that aren’t 10-8, the new judging criteria clarified the language of what was already being taught in training.

With that, let’s press mute and get down to business…in silence…complete and total silence. Maybe this wasn’t such a great idea after all.

Please forgive any typos in real time.


Jose Aldo vs. Max Holloway

Claudia Gadelha vs. Karolina Kowalkiewicz

Vitor Belfort vs. Nate Marquardt

Paulo Borrachinha vs. Oluwale Bamgbose

Yancy Medeiros vs. Erick Silva


Marlon Moraes vs. Raphael Assuncao

Antonio Carlos Junior vs. Eric Spicely

Johnny Eduardo vs. Matthew Lopez

Iuri Alcantara vs. Brian Kelleher


Viviane Pereira vs. Jamie Moyle

Luan Chagas vs.Jim Wallhead

Marco Beltran vs. Deiveson Alcantara

Paul is Bloody Elbow’s analytics and business writer and is a licensed MMA judge for the California Amateur Mixed Martial Arts Organization (CAMO). Follow him @MMAanalytics.

Source – link to original article